US Showing More Lack of Neutrality on Israel/Palestine

Now that talks are resuming between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority, there is more evidence of the US’ lack of neutrality.  Reuters reports:

“In another sign of possible momentum, Martin Indyk, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel who directs the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution think tank in Washington, is expected to be named as the new U.S. envoy for Middle East peace, possibly as early as Monday, a source familiar with the matter said.”

First, if the US wanted to be an impartial mediator it would not name the former ambassador to Israel.  Imagine in the 1980′s if the US had named its ambassador to the UK as the “envoy for peace between the UK and Ireland.”  Fortunately, it chose George Mitchell.

A more specific example of Indyk’s lack of neutrality is his description of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran as the “rejectionist bloc,” which although is considered conventional wisdom, indicates an unwillingness to empathize with the Palestinians or see any reason why, for example, a guerrilla militia that developed to push out an occupying army would still harbor animosity towards the country that occupied it.  This is not to excuse the violations of the laws of war by either Hezbollah or Hamas.  But to refer to the elected government of the Palestinian people as a “terrorist government” as Indyk did, is not becoming of a mediating diplomat.

Lastly, and I must emphasize that this is not meant as any kind of racist or religious slur, it is not neutral to pick someone who is Jewish as a mediator between the two sides, just as it would be ludicrous to pick an Arab or even a Muslim American.  Going back to someone like George Mitchell, as Obama did in his first term, would be far more appropriate.

 

3 Thoughts on “US Showing More Lack of Neutrality on Israel/Palestine

  1. David C. on July 29, 2013 at 7:14 am said:

    Thoughtful, accurate and fair. It takes courage to speak truth against deception, especially when the government is reading our mail. Thank you Adam.
    David C.

  2. Um….
    Using your Unresearched yardstick for negotiators, George Mitchell wouldn’t qualify for the UK/Ireland mediation Nor the Israel/Arab one.

    Wiki:
    Mitchell was born in Waterville, Maine. His father, George John Mitchell, Sr. (born Joseph Kilroy), was of ethnic Irish descent but was adopted by a Lebanese family when he was orphaned.[3] … Mitchell’s mother, Mary (née Saad), was a textile worker who emigrated to the United States in 1920 from Bkassine, Lebanon, at the age of eighteen.

    Because of his origin, Mitchell is recognized as a prominent Arab-American.[4]
    ….
    Mitchell was raised a Maronite Catholic and in his childhood served as an altar boy at St. Joseph’s Maronite Church in Maine.[6]….

  3. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts
    and I am waiting for your further post thanks once
    again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Post Navigation